We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using Orbitax's services, you agree that we may store cookies on your device. Cookie Policy.
The AI assistant for tax questions
Track worldwide tax law changes daily
Cross-border tax analysis and data
Unify and empower your entity management
Provides compliance steps, forms & rates
Visualize and manage your entity data
Comprehensive compliance management
Audit and global tax controversy tracking
Manage reportable cross-border arrangements
Country-by-country reporting & compliance
Pillar 2 planning, reporting and compliance
Calculate US tax impact of foreign operations
Automated workflows for recurring tax tasks
Secure API connections to 3rd-party systems
Secure storage for your tax documentation
The AI assistant for tax questions
Collaborate securely on your tax data
Share This Article
|
|
The Tax Court applied an unspecified method in its transfer pricing analysis to determine the royalty rates for license agreements between Medtronic US and its Puerto Rican subsidiary. The Tax Court rejected the IRS’s use of the Comparable Profits Method (CPM) and Medtronic US’s application of the comparable uncontrolled transaction (CUT) method. The Tax Court’s opinion in Medtronic III provides guidance for future related-party transactions.On 18 August 2022, the United States (US) Tax Court issued its second opinion in Medtronic, Inc. and Consolidated Subsidiaries v. Commissioner (Medtronic III).1 In this opinion, the Tax Court rejected the principal transfer pricing analysis of both the...