We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using Orbitax's services, you agree that we may store cookies on your device. Cookie Policy.
The AI assistant for tax questions
Track worldwide tax law changes daily
Cross-border tax analysis and data
Unify and empower your entity management
Provides compliance steps, forms & rates
Visualize and manage your entity data
Comprehensive compliance management
Audit and global tax controversy tracking
Manage reportable cross-border arrangements
Country-by-country reporting & compliance
Pillar 2 planning, reporting and compliance
Calculate US tax impact of foreign operations
Automated workflows for recurring tax tasks
Secure API connections to 3rd-party systems
Secure storage for your tax documentation
The AI assistant for tax questions
Collaborate securely on your tax data
Share This Article
|
|
The US Tax Court has denied a taxpayer the deduction for qualified domestic production activities under section 199 of the US Internal Revenue Code (IRC) when the taxpayer used advertising materials printed by a third party for its direct mail advertising business (ADVO, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Docket No. 17247-10, 24 October 2013). The taxpayer was a US corporation that engaged in direct mail advertising, i.e. distribution of advertising materials by mail in the United States on behalf of the taxpayer's clients. The advertising materials at issue were supplied by the taxpayer, but the taxpayer contracted...