We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using Orbitax's services, you agree that we may store cookies on your device. Cookie Policy.
The AI assistant for tax questions
Track worldwide tax law changes daily
Cross-border tax analysis and data
Unify and empower your entity management
Provides compliance steps, forms & rates
Visualize and manage your entity data
Comprehensive compliance management
Audit and global tax controversy tracking
Manage reportable cross-border arrangements
Country-by-country reporting & compliance
Pillar 2 planning, reporting and compliance
Calculate US tax impact of foreign operations
Automated workflows for recurring tax tasks
Secure API connections to 3rd-party systems
Secure storage for your tax documentation
The AI assistant for tax questions
Collaborate securely on your tax data
Share This Article
|
|
The Indian Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) delivered a ruling dated 16 February 2006 in the case of Morgan Stanley and Co., United States (the Applicant) wherein it has been held that the Applicant's captive business process outsourcing (BPO) in India was not its permanent establishment (PE) under Art. 5 of the India-US tax treaty (the tax treaty). Hence, the income would not be taxable in India. (a) Facts. The Applicant was a non-resident entity incorporated and tax resident in the US. It provided financial advisory services, corporate lending and securities underwriting services. Morgan Stanley Advantage Services Private Limited (MSAS)...