We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using Orbitax's services, you agree that we may store cookies on your device. Cookie Policy.
The AI assistant for tax questions
Track worldwide tax law changes daily
Cross-border tax analysis and data
Unify and empower your entity management
Provides compliance steps, forms & rates
Visualize and manage your entity data
Comprehensive compliance management
Audit and global tax controversy tracking
Manage reportable cross-border arrangements
Country-by-country reporting & compliance
Pillar 2 planning, reporting and compliance
Calculate US tax impact of foreign operations
Automated workflows for recurring tax tasks
Secure API connections to 3rd-party systems
Secure storage for your tax documentation
The AI assistant for tax questions
Collaborate securely on your tax data
Share This Article
|
|
With cross-border controversy growing at a rapid pace, companies need to be aware of options to resolve tax controversy disputes. The Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) is one avenue that companies may consider. OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Action 14 efforts and the peer review process have helped drive improvements to MAP. These improvements have resulted in growing taxpayer participation in MAP, a number of countries introducing new MAP guidance (such as the Philippines and Morocco), increased resources devoted to MAP, and countries issuing updated MAP guidance. An example of such a development can be found in the EY...