We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using Orbitax's services, you agree that we may store cookies on your device. Cookie Policy.
The AI assistant for tax questions
Track worldwide tax law changes daily
Cross-border tax analysis and data
Unify and empower your entity management
Provides compliance steps, forms & rates
Visualize and manage your entity data
Comprehensive compliance management
Audit and global tax controversy tracking
Manage reportable cross-border arrangements
Country-by-country reporting & compliance
Pillar 2 planning, reporting and compliance
Calculate US tax impact of foreign operations
Automated workflows for recurring tax tasks
Secure API connections to 3rd-party systems
Secure storage for your tax documentation
Automated tax workflows with secure APIs.
Collaborate securely on your tax data
Share This Article
|
|
On 13 March 2013, the Czech Supreme Administrative Court gave its decision in case 1 Afs 99/2012-52, Goldfein CZ s.r.o. v. Appellate Financial Directorate concerning the burden of proof in transfer pricing disputes and the application of transfer pricing methods. (a) Facts. Goldfein CZ s.r.o. (the plaintiff) was a company resident in the Czech Republic. In August 2008, the plaintiff filed an additional tax return in respect of its 2007 tax liability. In that return, the plaintiff declared that its tax liability for 2007 should have been higher than originally declared, because the transfer prices in transactions with its parent...