We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using Orbitax's services, you agree that we may store cookies on your device. Cookie Policy.
The AI assistant for tax questions
Track worldwide tax law changes daily
Cross-border tax analysis and data
Unify and empower your entity management
Provides compliance steps, forms & rates
Visualize and manage your entity data
Comprehensive compliance management
Audit and global tax controversy tracking
Manage reportable cross-border arrangements
Country-by-country reporting & compliance
Pillar 2 planning, reporting and compliance
Calculate US tax impact of foreign operations
Automated workflows for recurring tax tasks
Secure API connections to 3rd-party systems
Secure storage for your tax documentation
Automated tax workflows with secure APIs.
Collaborate securely on your tax data
Share This Article
|
|
The Indian Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) issued its decision on 26 February 2013 in the case of ACIT v. Funskool (India) Ltd. (ITA No. 110/Mds/2008) that the Taxpayer, who used the comparable uncontrolled price method, was correct to adjust the arm's length price (ALP) for expenses incurred in connection with advertisement, marketing, sales and administrative departments. The ITAT noted that the Taxpayer had not incurred advertisement and marketing expenses for sales (97% of sales) made to the associated enterprise in the United States. Further, the ITAT rejected the Taxpayer's contention on the second issue of adjusting to ALP by...