We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using Orbitax's services, you agree that we may store cookies on your device. Cookie Policy.
The AI assistant for tax questions
Track worldwide tax law changes daily
Cross-border tax analysis and data
Unify and empower your entity management
Provides compliance steps, forms & rates
Visualize and manage your entity data
Comprehensive compliance management
Audit and global tax controversy tracking
Manage reportable cross-border arrangements
Country-by-country reporting & compliance
Pillar 2 planning, reporting and compliance
Calculate US tax impact of foreign operations
Automated workflows for recurring tax tasks
Secure API connections to 3rd-party systems
Secure storage for your tax documentation
Automated tax workflows with secure APIs.
Collaborate securely on your tax data
Share This Article
|
|
The Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently issued an order regarding beneficial ownership requirements and the provisions of Article 13 (Capital Gains) of the 1982 income and capital tax treaty with Mauritius. In particular, the order addresses whether beneficial ownership requirements must be met in order to benefit from paragraph 4 of Article 13, which essentially provides that gains from the alienation of property not specified in Article 13 are only taxable in the Contracting State of residence of the Alienator. In the case at hand, a company established in Mauritius (the assessee), and wholly owned by a company...