We use cookies to provide you with the best possible experience. By using Orbitax's services, you agree that we may store cookies on your device. Cookie Policy.
The AI assistant for tax questions
Track worldwide tax law changes daily
Cross-border tax analysis and data
Unify and empower your entity management
Provides compliance steps, forms & rates
Visualize and manage your entity data
Comprehensive compliance management
Audit and global tax controversy tracking
Manage reportable cross-border arrangements
Country-by-country reporting & compliance
Pillar 2 planning, reporting and compliance
Calculate US tax impact of foreign operations
Automated workflows for recurring tax tasks
Secure API connections to 3rd-party systems
Secure storage for your tax documentation
Automated tax workflows with secure APIs.
Collaborate securely on your tax data
Share This Article
|
|
The Dutch Supreme Court issued a decision on 19 July 2017 finding that a Belgian employee of a Belgian company who was resident in the Netherlands for 181 work days but more than 183 total days when counting weekends, holidays, personal days etc., met the 183-day physical presence test and that the Belgian employee's salary was subject to Dutch personal income tax. To determine which days to count for the 183-day rule-- and because the treaty does not define "presence"--the Supreme Court looked to the Commentary to the OECD Model Convention which states that the days of physical presence include...